Limit

Limit covers a serious topic. It is a simulation of modern human civilisation. It is based on the Meadows Report "The Limits to Growth", which says that because our planet and its resources are finite, constant growth is impossible. We will sooner or later hit a saturation point. Yet humans behave as if there is not such limit. Every corporate CEO is expected to achieve ever higher results. We chase the newer phone, the fancier car, the bigger house. The game is designed with an intention to make people think about how we behave as humankind. 

In the game, each player manages a nation over several generations, beginning from 1850, i.e. the start of the industrial revolution. You manage food production, consumer goods production, weapons production, the quality of life of your people, social unrest and your population. All if this is done using a card drafting and card play mechanism. You can trade in the global markets. Your actions have various consequences. 

This is your player board. The green, blue and red tracks are your production levels for food, consumer goods and weapons. All aspects of your nation are represented here. 

This is the quality of life of five classes of your society, from richest to poorest. You must improve the quality of life of a richer class before you can improve others below it. It is possible to try to give everyone a similar quality of life (like the above), or you can also choose for the richest to have a good life while the poorest suffer. Different rules and abilities apply depending on the quality of life levels of Classes A, C and E. That is why you may want to have specific classes at specific levels. Class A having a higher quality of life gives you more options in picking policies. This helps you better govern your nation. The quality of life of Class C affects the consumer goods being consumed by your nation and also the birth rate. At the end of the game, Classes A, C and E contribute to your score. 

This is your population level and your social unrest. Quality of life affects population growth, and population in turn affects how much food and consumer goods you need. Social unrest is on a scale from Boom to Growth to Uprising. Various things you do affect social unrest. Naturally you want to avoid hitting the uprising positions. 

This is the central board, and it represents the global market. Food, consumer goods, weapons and fuel are bought and sold here, and prices are influenced by player actions. The bank in the game is called the IMF. It has a lot of money, but it might run out of money and trigger a financial crisis. 

These cards are the meat of the game. You start the game with some basic cards, and every round you may get some new ones. There are three decks in the game - society, production, and military / economy. Which deck you choose to draw from determines what kind of cards you will get. In the action part of a round, players take turns playing cards. Generally these cards help you build your nation and tweak it in different ways. Some cards allow you to attack other nations, like this one below. 

I played the game on BoardGameArena.com. I must admit I didn't have enough patience to remember all the rules. I played by gut feel and let the computer handle the consequences of my actions. I took a communist path, or at least that was how I perceived myself. I kept the quality of life as equal as possible for all social classes. I did have to increase Class A first, but once it is one notch above the rest, I prioritised improving the quality of life for all the other classes before coming back to take care of Class A again. I knew there would be some drawbacks, but I just stuck with this. It turned out to work well for me. I think I was lucky with the cards I drew. They synergised well. I didn't pay attention to the other players. They seemed to struggle a bit. 

My population grew. My production capacities grew. I was strongest militarily. I was a little tempted to attack others, just to see how it worked, but eventually I didn't because it felt cumbersome. Since I was already ahead (at least I thought so then), I didn't need to use military to get ahead. I did start to run out of land. If I could capture others' territories it would help me continue to grow. 

Our game ended because we had four crises. The other way the game ends is completing 7 rounds. I was a little surprised that one of the crises worsened my social unrest so much that I went into uprising. I had been managing my social unrest pretty well. At one point, all my social classes had the max quality of life. I was pretty pleased with myself. I did right by my people. However I was shocked to find out that I did horribly at the final scoring. I had too much pollution and lost many points for that. My people still had the best quality of life, but my population was low so that didn't give me many points. I should have paid more attention to how scoring worked. Jia Yaik made a lot of money and that gave him many points. Eventually it was Jon who won because he was well balanced and screwed up the least. 

I think the intention of the game is we are supposed to try to survive and hopefully thrive till the end of the 7th round. If we trigger four crises before that, it feels like we have lost because we have mismanaged our planet. This is a game with a lot of rules. Many elements of your nation affect others. This is a complex simulation and you do a lot of housekeeping. It is like work. This is actually a lesson about nation-building and international geopolitics. I find it a little tiresome to learn the rules. It takes a fair bit of effort to fully understand all the implications of your choices. Yet, I have some curiosity to see how we can survive till the end. If I'm going to play this again I certainly need to have more discipline in understanding it better. Most of the time the gameplay feels solitaire. You are managing your own nation. Actions at the global market do affect other players, but that interaction isn't that strong. Military actions affect opponents more directly, but it depends on whether players use them much. I am tempted to try this just to see whether we can last till the end. 

Design & Play 2026 - Malaysian game design competition

 

The Design & Play (DNP) game design competition is back! This is a competition open to all Malaysians. It is organised by Malaysia Boardgame Design (MBD). This was first held in 2025, so this is the second year we are doing this. We have the same team of six judges - all local designers and indie publishers. This year, the criteria is a little different. Instead of being limited to using cards as game components, you can now use dice as well. We are still sticking to the Malaysian theme. The goal is to promote Malaysian game design after all. We want to be an incubator which encourages new game designers. We want to bring good Malaysian game designs to the world stage. Whether you are new to designing tabletop games or otherwise, this is a good opportunity to get those creative juices going and experience the process of bringing a game to life. Every entry will be given feedback from our team of judges. The winner will have an opportunity to get their game published. Let's make some magic! 

I am very excited about this. I felt proud to be Malaysian when I played several of the finalists last year. We do have great talent. We did have entries which needed more polish, and contestants would benefit from more exposure to different games. However even among these entries I saw some promising concepts and healthy innovation. I hope to see several of them return this year. There were a few I wished could have made it to the final round. 

And I am hoping someone will make a game about how chill Malaysians are even when flights are delayed heh heh... 

7 Wonders Duel: Pantheon

Pantheon is an expansion for 7 Wonders Duel. Allen came across this at Cash Converters in Singapore, and it was a fantastic deal, SGD3.00! That's less than MYR10.00. As a game buyer I’m thrilled about these great deals. At the same time as an indie publisher it’s a little sad to see slightly older games get the stock clearance treatment. I guess to view it positively it is a good thing that a game gets sold and it gets played. 

Pantheon brings gods to 7 Wonders Duel. There are three gods for each of the five ancient civilisations, and every game up to six may come into play. Each civilisation has a different strength, and their gods have powers in that specialty. For example Egyptian gods help you with wonders of the world. 

In Age 1, players have opportunities to choose which gods to bring into the game and where to place them at the pantheon. Where a god is placed on the board determines how expensive it is to summon them. The nearer they are to you, the cheaper they will be to you, which also means they will be more expensive for your opponent. Each god can only be summoned once per game, and they give powerful one-time abilities. 

When you pick up a brown-backed token, you get to choose a god to introduce to the game.

Five stacks of gods, and one gate.

Mesopotamian gods (green) help with science.

The original game board gets extended, adding a pantheon above it where five gods and one gate can be placed. 

There are new wonders and technologies related to gods. You also get some game components which are for specific gods. Guilds are replaced by grand temples. This aspect has become simpler than the base game. Guilds used to offer various ways to score bonus points. Grand temples are associated with gods of specific civilisations. If you have collected tokens of the corresponding civilisations earlier in the game, their grand temples are free to build. Otherwise you can still build them using your resources. There are at most three grand temples in a game. The more you build, the more points each will be worth. 

Grand temples

The red pawn is Minerva's shield. It prevents one military attack. 

Nisaba's snake copies an opponent's science icon. Copyright laws were not yet invented.

Pantheon adds some gameplay elements and offers more options. When you summon a god, you don’t take a card from the card structure. This can be important when you want to avoid letting your opponent take a certain card. The god powers are potent. They can give you a critical advantage. If you play the base game a lot, this is a nice expansion to give you some new content. It is not just more of the same. It brings in new elements. 

Asian Board Games Festival - the Philippines

 

I will be at the Asian Board Games Festival (ABGF) in the Philippines this coming weekend 2 - 3 May 2026. If you are in Manila, come and say hi! 

Dream of the Red Chamber - first prototype

The game I am publishing this year under Cili Padi Games is Pilgrim Poker, and it uses the theme of Journey to the West (西游记). I also have another game which will be published by Specky Studio - Rebels of the Three Kingdoms, which, of course, is based on Romance of the Three Kingdoms (三国演义). The advantage of using a topic or theme which many people are already familiar with is the game can be more attractive, and it can be a bit easier for people to learn to play. I have covered two of the four major Chinese works of literature, so naturally I start to consider the other two. Origame from Singapore has recently released 108 Outlaws, a game based on Water Margin (水浒传), so I probably shouldn't publish a game with this theme so soon. So I set my eyes on Dream of the Red Chamber (红楼梦). 

I have never read Dream of the Red Chamber before. I only know a little about it. During the Chinese New Year holidays I started doing some research on the book. I discovered many things I hadn't known before, some of which surprised me. I hadn't known that the author Cao Xueqin (曹雪芹) didn't write the whole book. He wrote the first 80 chapters, and the last 40 were written by someone else. I had always thought of the character Xue Baochai (薛宝钗) as the villain, which is completely untrue. I learned that the novel has another name - The Story of the Stone (石头记) and in fact when first translated to English, it was called this name. One thing is a little embarrassing. Due to the subject matter, I kept thinking the author Cao Xueqin is female. I only recently checked and learned he's a guy. 

I had difficulties thinking of a game mechanism. I wasn't constantly working on this, I just occasionally thought about it. Eventually an idea for the game mechanism came to me when I was sleeping. I'm not 100% sure whether I was sleeping / dreaming then, or I was half awake. I was certainly in bed. In the next few days after I had that idea, I did more research and then created my first prototype. AI helped a lot in my research. I asked it to give me summaries, e.g. who are the most important 10 characters in the book, in which chapters do certain characters appear together. My game is a set collection game, and you make sets based on specific scenes in the story, involving specific combinations of characters. 

Elder daughter Shee Yun was first to playtest the game with me. The two-player game seems to work well. I will need to test the game a lot more to see whether it is feasible for publication. I expect I will need to make adjustments. At the moment I think it will be just a 2 to 4 player game. 

I later playtested it with both my wife Michelle and Shee Yun, trying the 3-player version. That seems to work okay too. The game is a rummy variant. In some ways it's even simpler, because you can't do layoffs. In other ways it is a little more complicated, because the melds you can make are not runs or cards of the same value. The melds are scenes in the story. There are 11 different scenes in the game, translated to 11 possible melds. Every meld requires a specific combination of characters. It can consist of as few as two characters and as many as six. The two-character melds are mostly worth only 1 point, while the six-character meld is worth 11 points. There are ten different characters in the game. The lead characters like Jia Baoyu (贾宝玉) and Lin Daiyu (林黛玉) have more cards - seven, while the secondary characters have fewer. There are only three cards for Granny Liu (刘姥姥). 

Gameplay is simple. On your turn you must draw a card. You may play at most one meld on your turn. At the end of your turn, you may discard a card. You have a hand limit of six, which is the same as the number of cards of the largest meld. If you have too many cards, you must discard a card at the end of your turn. A round doesn't end when a player plays all cards. It only ends when the deck runs out. You want to play as many melds as you can, so most of the time you won't want to discard cards. However, there is a penalty for each card left in hand when a round ends. If you have three cards or fewer, it is 1 point per card, but if you have four or more, it is 2 points each. As the draw deck gets thinner, you will become more anxious and you will probably settle for the lower value melds so that you don't get stuck with too many cards when the round ends. 

My initial idea for the game was a bit more complicated. In addition to draw - meld - discard, I had a pass card step. The active player must pass a card around the table. Every other player has the opportunity to take the card being passed then pass on a different card. Otherwise they just pass on the same card. This is all done with the card face-up. This is meant to make making melds easier. I wanted to create difficult decisions. When you pass a card, you try not to pass cards which will help others. I also wanted this mechanism to give information to players. If an opponent takes a card then passes on a different card, it gives you information about which meld he might be attempting to make. When I playtested this, Michelle and Shee Yun felt it was confusing. They didn't like it at all and found it frustrating. Okay, I guess I should keep things simple. 

I still need to playtest this with four players. I'm a little uneasy that for the moment this game seems to be just a simple rummy variant. I don't know whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. It's good to make this a game anyone can learn to play easily, if my goal is to promote boardgames and card games. I'm just a little uneasy about whether I can justify the existence of a game if it doesn't offer something different enough. 

Snow White 2nd edition

The second edition of Snow White and the Eleven Dwarfs has been out for a while, last year in fact, but I have not yet mentioned it. This is a game I struggled with a bit, on whether to do a second printing. The first edition did not sell particularly fast. Partly it is because this is a game with a minimum player count of 7. I was running out of stock, and I still had enquiries, so I decided to do another print run. At the time I received positive feedback from Thailand about the game, so that was part of my motivation too. 

Comparing the two editions (first on the left, second on the right), to be honest I like the first edition cover better because it is cleaner. Well, it is cleaner because I forgot several things. I forgot to put  the designer name and the publisher logo. I do think both are important. So now that grumpy dwarf at the bottom right corner suffers the same fate at Mike Wazowski of Monsters Inc. 

The second edition is slightly thicker. I wanted to make sure all cards still fit comfortably after being sleeved. For the first edition, after sleeving the cards, the box is just slightly too small for them and the lid no longer fits perfectly. With the second edition, I have two more rulebooks and one more card, so I made the box deeper. 

One more thing you will notice is the Japanese text has been changed to Chinese. In the first edition, the Japanese text is just flavour. I don't have any Japanese rules. It's just that the art is in a Japanese manga style. In the second edition I now have rules in both Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese. So I should have the Chinese name on the box now. 

I did small changes to the back of the box. I follow international best practices more now, having the child safety icon and the CE mark. I have the language icons now. 

I used the four sides of the box bottom to advertise the other Cili Padi Games titles. You can see Pinocchio and Dancing Queen here. 

Rulebooks in three languages

Cards in the first edition had Japanese text, more for flavour than for gameplay. The cards did have English text or numbers. Now the Japanese text is changed to Chinese. 

The game remains the same except for this one single card. This is the Huntsman variant. It is an advanced variant and you will only play this after you know at least two other variants - at least one of the Prince variants, and the Evil Queen variant. The Huntsman must be played with at least one Prince (you can play with both) and the Evil Queen. 

Snow White, Prince Charming and the Huntsman are kind of on the same team. The two other teams are the Dwarfs and the Evil Queen (who might convert Dwarfs to become her Evil Minions). Despite both supporting Snow White, Prince Charming and the Huntsman are not friends. They are rivals. Prince Charming wins by finding Dwarf #1 (Happy), and if he wins, Snow White wins too. However the Huntsman loses. The Huntsman wins by finding the Evil Queen. If he does, Snow White wins too, but Prince Charming loses. This sounds like Snow White can just sit back and relax and let the two guys do the work. This is not true. Snow White can win the game by finding Happy herself, and if she does that, she wins the game by herself. Both Prince Charming and the Huntsman lose. She is a strong and independent woman and does not need to rely on a man to win. 

If you have the first edition of the game, you can play the Huntsman variant by using Dwarf #14 as the Huntsman. 

Game components

Malaysia Boardgame Show on national TV

The Malaysia Boardgame Show was covered on national television. See the clip here (the video is in Malay): https://www.facebook.com/reel/4243861829210835 

The organiser Jon. My friend is on TV! 

Effendy's game Melaka won 3rd place in the Zenobia Awards

Many Malaysian themed games were showcased at the event

Malaysia Boardgame Show 2026: 2 busy days!

18-19 Apr 2026 was the Malaysia Boardgame Show. It was held at Jaya One shopping mall in PJ. In the past few years there has been several different boardgame-specific events in Malaysia, like Asian Board Game Festival (in Penang), Boxcon, All Aboard, Dice & Dine, Anigames. Not all are recurring. MBS is organised by Jon, who is currently the most active game designer in Malaysia. He has managed to gather a large group of volunteers and helpers for the event. I am hopeful MBS will become a recurring event in Malaysia. 

I participated as a local designer and publisher, and I had a small booth on the Ground Floor. The event took up two floors. The Ground Floor was open to the public, and booths selling games were all on G/F. First Floor was the activity area, i.e. the ticketed area. You had to buy a pass to access the activities here. There were volunteers bringing their games to teach others to play. You could sell your pre-loved games. Buying games did not require a ticket. There were large group games hosted (2 Rooms and a Boom, Blood on the Clocktower etc). There were also four competitions being run over the weekend, including for Dune Imperium. 

Local publisher Meja Belakang (makers of Drama Pukul 7) was right next to me and Jia Xian photobombed me. 

I still had a lingering cough after the Raya event (Dice and Dine at Lalaport) one month ago. The two days at MBS were almost non-stop teaching games. There was a good crowd. Saturday I could only take a break around 7pm. Sunday I had some breaks here and there. When friends passed by, many couldn't chat with me because I was in the middle of teaching games. 

Event keychains

This was one of the game shelves on the First Floor. Many volunteers brought their own games to place at these shelves. They taught visitors to play, and sometimes played with them. A big part of this event was the community. I think it is amazing that we have so many generous volunteers, willing to bring their precious collections to the event to teach strangers to play. If you are a visitor, you can browse the games and if there is a specific game you want to try, you look for the owner (whose name would be on the box) and he or she will teach you to play. 

I only had time to take some photos of the First Floor in the early morning before visitors started coming. Once the event started, I was at my booth most of the time. 

There were game auctions. 

Another area for games brought by volunteers. 

The red and white flags are for when you need help or need more players.

There was a Carcassonne competition and a Hikadyat competition. 

Custom-made gaming tables. 

Another game library

This is a huge box

Very impressive game components

These are wonders of the world

I sneaked up to take another photo when there were a bit more people.

I'm thinking I'm probably positioning my table (red tablecloth) wrong. It looks less welcoming. I probably should have turned it 90 degrees to be the same as my neighbours. 

On my other side was Roll Rebellion, makers of the highly successful HR Game. 

My vendor tag

There were vendors from Singapore (Ben from LaiPlayLeow) and from Thailand (Milk from BGN). Milk runs the Thailand Board Game Show which I have been to twice, and she was a wonderful host. This time it is us Malaysians' turn to host her. 

There was a section for educational games. There was even a seminar on game design. MBS was very much about the Malaysian boardgame community, about people coming together to play games and have fun. And that's how it should be.